Who we Are

Created on 2012, PLENITUDE wishes to become a new reference towards professionalism and Client orientation standards on the Energy and Internationalization areas.

Events

PL Comissão Executiva_6

PLENITUDE on Económico TV

"Comissão Executiva" program broadcasted by Económico TV on last 28th of March were topics like Inovation, R&D, Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness of Portuguese companies were discussed by Luís Martinez from Nova Business School, Tawfiq ...

Energy Highlights

Three reasons why MISO and SPP must jointly plan the transmission system

At the January 11 policy meeting, SPP staff explained their rationale to skip an economic planning cycle in favor of reliability planning studies due to the potential for misalignment of planning assessments in 2025. MISO had seen this before and did the same thing, skipping the 2020 “futures” assessment cycle in favor of 2021 futures. Another common thread among MISO and SPP is the high demand for renewable project interconnections. This demand is why SPP and MISO have jointly studied and identified a set of transmission projects that facilitate renewable interconnections at their border.

Both RTOs should plan their transmission system jointly because the transmission customers would benefit. An RTO conducts economic planning assessments to identify transmission projects that reduce congestion. The load pays the higher congestion costs. By skipping economic planning, consumers won’t know which projects reduce their costs. With more distributed energy resources projected to participate in organized markets, RTOs should plan the transmission system jointly.

Definitions – Economic Planning and Reliability Planning

Reliability transmission planning refers to planning for complying with the NERC reliability criteria such as an increase in demand, loss of a single largest generator, loss of a major transmission line, and short circuit studies, to name a few.

Economic transmission planning refers to complying with FERC orders on regional and interregional planning, such as reducing transmission congestion. RTOs like MISO and SPP conduct reliability planning as a NERC Planning Coordinator/Planning Authority, whereas RTOs conduct economic planning as a FERC jurisdictional transmission provider.

First, there is precedent given the Joint Targeted Interconnection Queue (JTIQ) Study

Both MISO and SPP have released their JTIQ report identifying transmission projects on the seams to facilitate renewable projects. The next step is how to allocate costs for those network upgrades. Interconnection customers have a clear line of sight when interconnecting at an RTO about network upgrade costs, but when their project has an impact on the neighboring RTO’s transmission system, it gets unclear.

Leveraging the MISO SPP Interregional Planning Stakeholder Advisory Committee (IPSAC) process established in 2014, MISO and SPP CEOs announced the JTIQ study in 2020. On a historical note, the first joint meeting of both MISO’s top planning advisory committee for economic planning and SPP’s economic studies working group was held in 2011. So, the seeds for coordination were set in motion in 2011 and formalized in 2014 via IPSAC.

Since then, MISO and SPP had IPSAC meetings to comply with FERC Order 1000 on interregional planning but had nothing to show for transmission project identification. Hence the 2020 JTIQ study. It is time for MISO and SPP to take their planning protocols to the next level by jointly working on reliability planning.

Second, MISO and SPP planning staff are both balancing economic and reliability planning needs

MISO and SPP transmission planning processes are similar in 3 aspects:

  1. Both conduct economic planning “futures” assessments in addition to reliability,
  2. Both have cost allocations procedures for the portfolio of transmission projects that address state policies such as Renewable Portfolio Standards, and
  3. Both have established trust with state regulators when it comes to transmission planning.

Hence this proposed joint exercise on reliability planning should work for states in MISO and SPP. Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Missouri, Arkansas, and Texas would benefit the most, where MISO and SPP operate.

By skipping an economic cycle, the consumers in these vertically integrated states are not seeing the benefits of participating in RTOs. Moreover, with delays in the interconnection queues, consumers cannot benefit from lower-cost resources sooner.

Third, MISO and SPP anticipate an increase in distributed energy resources

In addition to increasing renewable energy, including energy storage resources, both RTOs could see an increased demand for the distribution-connected resources to participate in the organized markets due to FERC Order 2222. Aggregated distributed energy resources can participate in energy, capacity (SPP does not have one), and ancillary services markets.

To ensure DER market registration, RTOs must coordinate with the distribution utilities. But these distribution companies must follow state-approved distribution interconnection rules because RTOs don’t have authority over distribution systems. Hence, for MISO and SPP staff to coordinate with states, this proposed approach of jointly planning the transmission system can reduce RTO staff time, and RTOs can use that freed up time to coordinate DERs integration with state regulatory staff.

NERC Compliance obligations can be delegated

Both MISO and SPP take on transmission planning compliance obligations for their transmission owning members. It is one of the benefits of participating in RTOs. Jointly conducting transmission planning TPL NERC assessments can follow the “delegation agreement” approach. MISO and MISO TOs have a delegation agreement that states, the transmission owners have delegated to MISO some of their TPL compliance responsibilities since they participate in MISO model building and related planning assessments. At MISO, this is called MISO Transmission Expansion Plan (MTEP). It works similarly at SPP. Hence MISO and SPP jointly conducting reliability planning would follow this delegation approach.

Deferring to RTO planning assessments is not new to NERC. NERC Long Term Reliability Assessments (LTRA) take information from MISO and SPP resource assessments. This NERC LTRA avoids duplication of efforts among RTOs and the NERC regional entity, the Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO). SPP had a regional entity, but SPP dissolved that in July 2017 to focus more on RTO functions. That SPP RE footprint was absorbed in MRO.

Conclusion

In addition to recently having one NERC regional entity, multi-state RTOs like MISO and SPP have built trust from joint economic planning set in motion since 2011. It is time to take that trust built from economic planning and apply it to reliability planning.

Distributed energy resources and energy storage resources are adding a new set of planning challenges to RTO staff in addition to renewables interconnection. If both RTOs don’t collaborate further in transmission planning, the benefits of participating in RTOs for transmission owners and customers will reduce. That reduction in benefits translates into higher load costs, which means states will question their utility participation in RTOs. To avoid this by 2025, both MISO and SPP transmission planning staff should jointly conduct reliability planning instead of skipping economic planning cycles.

LINK

Sunpower will replace faulty connectors on C&I solar arrays

Sunpower said it may have to spend as much as $31 million to replace faulty connectors on an unspecified number of commercial and industrial (CIS) solar arrays.

Analyst firm Roth Capital Partners estimated that as many as 1,000 sites representing around 9 MW of installed capacity could be affected.

In a statement, Sunpower said that a product quality assessment identified a cracking issue that developed over time in factory-installed connectors within third-party commercial equipment supplied to SunPower.

Sunpower said that no reported safety incidents have been linked to the issue. It said that no performance issues had been identified either. The company said it would proactively replace all of the connectors to avoid what it said could be potential longer-term complications. Replacements are expected to take place during 2022, and that based on tests it expected systems to continue to operate safely while awaiting replacement.

The announcement reiterated Sunpower’s plan to sell its CIS business to focus on its residential business. The company said it was in “advanced discussions” with an unnamed party and expected to finalize an agreement within weeks. 

The company said fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) was expected to be at the low end of its guidance range of $18 to $41 million. It said that factors affecting results included weather in California and Covid-19 impacts. It also spent an extra $3 million on business development activities in new markets.

LINK

Latest Updates

Luanda’s Projekta Fair Debriefing

Desenho1

PLENITUDE's presence and services support delivered at PROJEKTA FAIR at Luanda's FIL Exhibition Center last October was considered a success by the 9 Portuguese Companies present at AEP's stand. During this reference event, 9 Portuguese companies ...

PLENITUDE awarded with “Trophy DNA 2013″

DSC_5571

PLENITUDE received the Trophy DNA 2013 delivered by the President of Cascais Municipality, Dr. Carlos Carreiras, on the 13th of June at Praça 5 de Outubro in Cascais, together with other 21 companies supported by DNACascais Agency. The initiative...

Asset Development & Management

Born strategic to grow valuable

THAT’S A GREAT IDEA.

Interested on developing energy assets internationally? Especially nowadays, it’s not enough to identify target markets and try to get projects on them. To do it properly in terms of value, risk and timing you need a strong Partner with solid track-record and local know-how and networking support that can deliver truly tailor-made services following your individual asset development criteria. With us you manage to have fully integrated services from Green-Field to O&M that assist you to develop real projects with solid market value.
Grab it with Plenitude!

Internationalization Support Services

Born global to grow successful

EXPAND TOWARDS THE FUTURE.

The world looks far so easier when you have someone reliable by your side highlighting your internationalization process according to what you need! In today’s world Internationalization is not about consultancy but about local practical support! That’s what we do for you: we created an integrated suite of services targeted to provide practical field support at the final destination markets providing your company increased speed and reduced time-to-market while clearing your way from avoidable risks and even assisting you on finding available financing mechanisms. You’ll get much faster and safer to your internationalization destiny market, reaching global success!

Innovative Energy Solutions

Born infinite to grow technological

RENEW YOUR ENERGY.

We have plenty solutions to innovate, save and profit! Take this chance and enjoy the best our planet supplies to all of us – changing the way you waste and use your energy will change your business and lifestyle in an unimaginably light way. From the sun to the wind, from the water to other forms of energy, we present it to you several innovative equipment and service solutions ranging from off-grid solar systems to Wind/Solar O&M systems based on UAV technology.

TRACK RECORD

Check our history and see it for yourself: trustworthiness and ambition are really hard to find inside and outside borders. Our results do not lie: we are bound for success. You are too!

Partners

PLENITUDE has crafted special relationships with a selection of top notch strategic and operational Partners who extend its services with high standards, thus originating a powerful integrated business network, only to provide you the best.